Residence Orders: Activists Denied the Right to Protest

⚠️ Urgent Information — Flash Radio is following this situation in real time. As the October 31 protest approaches, Tunisian lawyers are denouncing the use of residence orders to prevent certain activists from participating in gatherings. These measures, often referred to as MICAS, have sparked a debate on their legitimacy in a context of social tensions. The activists concerned, often figures in civil society, claim to be victims of a form of preventive repression. ⏱️ 1 min read. The facts and recent developments. The lawyers interviewed highlight that while these orders are legal, they are used discretionarily, particularly to compel activists to refrain from protesting. Their use before public events falls under a contested practice that could harm freedom of expression and citizen participation. Legal debates around these measures reveal a divide between public safety and individual rights. The situation raises questions about the transparency of authorities and their respect for democratic principles. Activists and their lawyers are calling for clarification of the criteria for applying these measures to ensure a balance between public order and fundamental freedoms. The Tunisian public is closely following these issues, which could have a significant impact on the country's political and social life. ⚡ Key Points ▸ Activists and their lawyers are calling for clarification of the criteria for applying these measures to ensure a balance between public order and fundamental freedoms. ▸ The lawyers interviewed highlight that these orders, although legal, are used discretionarily, particularly to compel activists to refrain from protesting. ▸ Their use before public events falls under a contested practice that could harm freedom of expression and citizen participation.